Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Elk Grove
This post compares Burbank, California to Elk Grove, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Elk Grove (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 166,228 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $60,199 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $349,500 |
| White | 70% | 45% |
| Black | 2% | 11% |
| Asian | 11% | 28% |
| With Kids | 27% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 57% | 27% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Elk Grove?
A: Burbank has a smaller population count than Elk Grove: 104765 compared with 166228 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Elk Grove?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Elk Grove?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 27% for Elk Grove.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z