Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Culver City
This post compares Burbank, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $735,600 |
| White | 70% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 15% |
| With Kids | 27% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 57% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Culver City?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Culver City: 104765 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z