Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Claremont
This post compares Burbank, California to Claremont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Claremont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 35,949 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $75,241 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $605,700 |
| White | 70% | 65% |
| Black | 2% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Claremont?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Claremont: 104765 compared with 35949 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Claremont?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Claremont?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 34% for Claremont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z