Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Beverly Hills
This post compares Burbank, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 70% | 82% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 9% |
| With Kids | 27% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 43 |
| Rentals | 57% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Beverly Hills?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 104765 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z