Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Bellflower
This post compares Burbank, California to Bellflower, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Bellflower (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 77,852 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $40,092 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $398,000 |
| White | 70% | 32% |
| Black | 2% | 13% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 27% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 57% | 60% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Bellflower?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Bellflower: 104765 compared with 77852 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Bellflower?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Bellflower?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 60% for Bellflower.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z