Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Ashland
This post compares Burbank, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $396,400 |
| White | 70% | 44% |
| Black | 2% | 17% |
| Asian | 11% | 20% |
| With Kids | 27% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 57% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Ashland?
A: Burbank has a much larger population count than Ashland: 104765 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Burbank versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z