Compare-Cities.com
Compare Burbank to Alameda
This post compares Burbank, California to Alameda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Burbank (city) | Alameda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,765 | 78,246 |
| Income (median) | $57,804 | $71,080 |
| Home Value (median) | $574,300 | $729,100 |
| White | 70% | 48% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 31% |
| With Kids | 27% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 57% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Burbank or Alameda?
A: Burbank has a larger population count than Alameda: 104765 compared with 78246 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Burbank or in Alameda?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Burbank.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Burbank or Alameda?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Burbank.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 57% for Burbank versus 53% for Alameda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Burbank may include: Monrovia, Lomita, and Glendale.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z