Compare-Cities.com
Compare Brea to South San Francisco
This post compares Brea, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Brea (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,921 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $63,346 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $610,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 66% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 21% | 39% |
| With Kids | 34% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Brea or South San Francisco?
A: Brea has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 41921 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Brea or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Brea.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Brea or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Brea.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Brea versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Brea may include: Placentia, Lake-Forest, and Aliso-Viejo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z