Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Walnut Creek
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Walnut Creek, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Walnut Creek (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 68,516 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $84,028 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $704,900 |
| White | 82% | 76% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 14% |
| With Kids | 24% | 21% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 48 |
| Rentals | 58% | 36% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Walnut Creek?
A: Beverly Hills has a smaller population count than Walnut Creek: 34506 compared with 68516 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Walnut Creek?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Walnut Creek?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 36% for Walnut Creek.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z