Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Union City
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $620,200 |
| White | 82% | 21% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 9% | 53% |
| With Kids | 24% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 58% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Union City?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Union City: 34506 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z