Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $374,600 |
| White | 82% | 81% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 3% |
| With Kids | 24% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 58% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Beverly Hills has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 34506 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z