Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to South El Monte
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $389,400 |
| White | 82% | 59% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 9% | 14% |
| With Kids | 24% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 58% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or South El Monte?
A: Beverly Hills has a larger population count than South El Monte: 34506 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z