Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to San Francisco
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $927,400 |
| White | 82% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 9% | 34% |
| With Kids | 24% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 38 |
| Rentals | 58% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or San Francisco?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 34506 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z