Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to San Bruno
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $754,700 |
| White | 82% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 28% |
| With Kids | 24% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 58% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or San Bruno?
A: Beverly Hills has a similar population count than San Bruno: 34506 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z