Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $444,200 |
| White | 82% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 9% | 13% |
| With Kids | 24% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 58% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 34506 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z