Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Porterville
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $163,100 |
| White | 82% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 9% | 4% |
| With Kids | 24% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 58% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Porterville?
A: Beverly Hills has a smaller population count than Porterville: 34506 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z