Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to National City
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $345,400 |
| White | 82% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 9% | 19% |
| With Kids | 24% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 32 |
| Rentals | 58% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or National City?
A: Beverly Hills has a smaller population count than National City: 34506 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or National City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z