Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Los Angeles
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $549,800 |
| White | 82% | 52% |
| Black | 1% | 8% |
| Asian | 9% | 11% |
| With Kids | 24% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 58% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Los Angeles?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 34506 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z