Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Lake Forest
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $585,100 |
| White | 82% | 67% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 15% |
| With Kids | 24% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 58% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Lake Forest?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 34506 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z