Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Irvine
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $753,400 |
| White | 82% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 41% |
| With Kids | 24% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 58% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Irvine?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 34506 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z