Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Cudahy
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Cudahy, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Cudahy (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 24,146 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $26,980 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $327,500 |
| White | 82% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 9% | 0% |
| With Kids | 24% | 60% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 27 |
| Rentals | 58% | 85% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Cudahy?
A: Beverly Hills has a larger population count than Cudahy: 34506 compared with 24146 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Cudahy?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Cudahy?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Cudahy does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 85% for Cudahy.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z