Compare-Cities.com
Compare Beverly Hills to Corona
This post compares Beverly Hills, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Beverly Hills (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,506 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $82,377 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $2,000,000+ | $411,600 |
| White | 82% | 66% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 9% | 11% |
| With Kids | 24% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 58% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Beverly Hills or Corona?
A: Beverly Hills has a much smaller population count than Corona: 34506 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Beverly Hills or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Beverly Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Beverly Hills or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Beverly Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 58% for Beverly Hills versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Beverly Hills may include: Carmichael, Fair-Oaks, and Redding.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z