Compare-Cities.com
Compare Berkeley to South San Francisco
This post compares Berkeley, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Berkeley (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 120,179 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $67,950 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $861,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 60% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 19% | 39% |
| With Kids | 20% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 39 |
| Rentals | 57% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Berkeley or South San Francisco?
A: Berkeley has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 120179 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Berkeley or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Berkeley.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Berkeley or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Berkeley.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Berkeley does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 57% for Berkeley versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Berkeley may include: Pasadena, Santa-Cruz, and Davis.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z