Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to South San Francisco
This post compares Belmont, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Belmont (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,110 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $107,466 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $697,400 |
White | 62% | 33% |
Black | 1% | 2% |
Asian | 27% | 39% |
With Kids | 32% | 34% |
Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or South San Francisco?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 27110 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z