Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to South Pasadena
This post compares Belmont, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 62% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 27% | 29% |
| With Kids | 32% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 40% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or South Pasadena?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 27110 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z