Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Belmont, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 62% | 81% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 27% | 3% |
| With Kids | 32% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 40% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Belmont has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 27110 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z