Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Selma
This post compares Belmont, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $171,200 |
| White | 62% | 78% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 27% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Selma?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Selma: 27110 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z