Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to San Francisco
This post compares Belmont, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 62% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 27% | 34% |
| With Kids | 32% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 40% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or San Francisco?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 27110 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z