Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Redwood City
This post compares Belmont, California to Redwood City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Redwood City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 84,368 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $70,131 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $1,016,700 |
| White | 62% | 60% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 27% | 14% |
| With Kids | 32% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 40% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Redwood City?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Redwood City: 27110 compared with 84368 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Redwood City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Redwood City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redwood City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 49% for Redwood City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z