Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Belmont, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 9% |
| Asian | 27% | 13% |
| With Kids | 32% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 35 |
| Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 27110 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z