Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Porterville
This post compares Belmont, California to Porterville, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Porterville (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 58,782 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $36,312 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $163,100 |
| White | 62% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 27% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Porterville?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Porterville: 27110 compared with 58782 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Porterville?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Porterville?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 46% for Porterville.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z