Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Belmont, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $633,400 |
| White | 62% | 75% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 27% | 13% |
| With Kids | 32% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Pleasant Hill?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Pleasant Hill: 27110 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z