Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Pico Rivera
This post compares Belmont, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $380,200 |
| White | 62% | 55% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 27% | 3% |
| With Kids | 32% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 36 |
| Rentals | 40% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Pico Rivera?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Pico Rivera: 27110 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z