Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Pasadena
This post compares Belmont, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $689,700 |
| White | 62% | 53% |
| Black | 1% | 10% |
| Asian | 27% | 16% |
| With Kids | 32% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 40% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Pasadena?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 27110 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z