Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Palm Springs
This post compares Belmont, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $340,600 |
| White | 62% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 27% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 54 |
| Rentals | 40% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Palm Springs?
A: Belmont has a smaller population count than Palm Springs: 27110 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z