Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Oakley
This post compares Belmont, California to Oakley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Oakley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 39,950 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $58,451 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $356,000 |
| White | 62% | 61% |
| Black | 1% | 8% |
| Asian | 27% | 7% |
| With Kids | 32% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 34 |
| Rentals | 40% | 24% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Oakley?
A: Belmont has a smaller population count than Oakley: 27110 compared with 39950 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Oakley?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Oakley?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 24% for Oakley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z