Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Livermore
This post compares Belmont, California to Livermore, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Livermore (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 88,232 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $75,750 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $643,200 |
| White | 62% | 78% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 27% | 10% |
| With Kids | 32% | 36% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Livermore?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Livermore: 27110 compared with 88232 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Livermore?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Livermore?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 28% for Livermore.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z