Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Laguna Hills
This post compares Belmont, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 31,235 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $58,400 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $649,700 |
| White | 62% | 69% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 27% | 14% |
| With Kids | 32% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 41 |
| Rentals | 40% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Laguna Hills?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Laguna Hills: 27110 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z