Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Foster City
This post compares Belmont, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 62% | 43% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 27% | 47% |
| With Kids | 32% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 40% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Foster City?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Foster City: 27110 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z