Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Foothill Farms
This post compares Belmont, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Belmont (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,110 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $107,466 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $201,200 |
White | 62% | 67% |
Black | 1% | 9% |
Asian | 27% | 5% |
With Kids | 32% | 38% |
Age (median) | 39 | 33 |
Rentals | 40% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Foothill Farms?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 27110 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z