Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Culver City
This post compares Belmont, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $735,600 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 27% | 15% |
| With Kids | 32% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 40% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Culver City?
A: Belmont has a smaller population count than Culver City: 27110 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z