Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Chino Hills
This post compares Belmont, California to Chino Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Chino Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 78,025 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $66,607 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $567,200 |
| White | 62% | 46% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 27% | 33% |
| With Kids | 32% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 40% | 23% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Chino Hills?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Chino Hills: 27110 compared with 78025 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Chino Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Chino Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 23% for Chino Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z