Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Burbank
This post compares Belmont, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $574,300 |
| White | 62% | 70% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 27% | 11% |
| With Kids | 32% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Burbank?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 27110 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z