Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Bakersfield
This post compares Belmont, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $228,400 |
| White | 62% | 68% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 27% | 7% |
| With Kids | 32% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Bakersfield?
A: Belmont has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 27110 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Belmont versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z