Compare-Cities.com
Compare Belmont to Atwater
This post compares Belmont, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Belmont (city) | Atwater (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,110 | 29,118 |
| Income (median) | $107,466 | $35,415 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,174,200 | $179,400 |
| White | 62% | 58% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 27% | 4% |
| With Kids | 32% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Belmont or Atwater?
A: Belmont has a similar population count than Atwater: 27110 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Belmont or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Belmont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Belmont or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Belmont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Belmont versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Belmont may include: San-Carlos, Pleasanton, and Mountain-View.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z