Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bellflower to South San Francisco
This post compares Bellflower, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bellflower (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,852 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $40,092 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $398,000 | $697,400 |
| White | 32% | 33% |
| Black | 13% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 60% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bellflower or South San Francisco?
A: Bellflower has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 77852 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bellflower or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Bellflower.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bellflower or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bellflower.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 60% for Bellflower versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bellflower may include: Lawndale, San-Pablo, and Ashland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z