Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bellflower to San Francisco
This post compares Bellflower, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bellflower (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,852 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $40,092 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $398,000 | $927,400 |
| White | 32% | 47% |
| Black | 13% | 5% |
| Asian | 13% | 34% |
| With Kids | 43% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 60% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bellflower or San Francisco?
A: Bellflower has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 77852 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bellflower or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bellflower.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bellflower or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bellflower.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 60% for Bellflower versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bellflower may include: Lawndale, San-Pablo, and Ashland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z