Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bellflower to Eureka
This post compares Bellflower, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Bellflower (city) | Eureka (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 77,852 | 27,024 |
Income (median) | $40,092 | $33,280 |
Home Value (median) | $398,000 | $249,300 |
White | 32% | 75% |
Black | 13% | 2% |
Asian | 13% | 7% |
With Kids | 43% | 23% |
Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
Rentals | 60% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bellflower or Eureka?
A: Bellflower has a larger population count than Eureka: 77852 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bellflower or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Bellflower.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bellflower or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Bellflower.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bellflower does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 60% for Bellflower versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bellflower may include: Lawndale, San-Pablo, and Ashland.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z