Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bell to South San Francisco
This post compares Bell, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bell (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,942 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $28,916 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $352,000 | $697,400 |
| White | 75% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 1% | 39% |
| With Kids | 53% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 70% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bell or South San Francisco?
A: Bell has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 35942 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bell or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bell.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bell or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Bell.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 70% for Bell versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bell may include: Maywood, Huntington-Park, and Bell-Gardens.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z