Compare-Cities.com
Compare Bell Gardens to Riverbank
This post compares Bell Gardens, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Bell Gardens (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,845 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $25,604 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $347,300 | $247,200 |
| White | 79% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 0% | 4% |
| With Kids | 61% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 28 | 32 |
| Rentals | 77% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Bell Gardens or Riverbank?
A: Bell Gardens has a larger population count than Riverbank: 42845 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Bell Gardens or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Bell Gardens.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Bell Gardens or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Bell Gardens.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bell Gardens does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 77% for Bell Gardens versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Bell Gardens may include: Maywood, Cudahy, and Bell.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z